image image
Norm from CSMI
Voted the best isokinetics system by isokinetics.net users!!!

The BEST just keeps getting better! the HUMAC NORM is the number one solution for measuring and improving performance in the clinic, training room, and research laboratory.

 
Read the Full Story
360 from CSMI
The latest inervation in human performance measurement.

The HUMAC360 is a small box that offers big results. Measuring 4” x 4” x 4” and weighing just 4 pounds, the HUMAC360 attaches to any patient or exercise equipment in seconds, using a 16’ retractable nylon belt. When the belt is pulled the HUMAC Software reports velocity, distance, and if a weight is recorded, power. These functional parameters are displayed on the screen for proper pacing and distance and in reports for evidence based rehabilitation. It could not be easier. 

Read the Full Story

Reliability

The reliability of isokinetic dynamometers is extremely high. The studies which have examined the accuracy of peak torque, work and power have shown correlation coefficients between 0.93 and 0.99 (Magnusson et al. 1990, Montgomery et al. 1989 Bemben et al.1989 are just a few of the independent articles available on this topic). The reliability of testing various joints is discussed below:-

        Shoulder

 

Greenfield et al (1990) and Perrin (1986) have demonstrated that internal and external rotation of the shoulder show greater reliability than flexion and extension. The reliability of shoulder extension and flexion testing is best when performed in a neutral position with reliability decreasing with shoulder abduction (Chan and Maffoulli, 1996). Trunk stabilization is important for reliable measures but nay have to be compromised for subjects safety (Frisiello et al, 1994).

        Knee

Very high reliability as established by Kannus (1994). However, eccentric testing shows greater variability than concentric testing (Kramer, 1990).

        Ankle

Correlation coefficients for concentric actions vary from 0.67-0.94 with little data available for eccentric actions (Cawthorn et al, 1991, Wennerberg, 1991, Karnofel et al, 1989).

        Wrist

Lower reliability probably due to small ROM and torque production (thus variations in small torque values are obviously magnified particularly if the dynamometer does not register decimal places) (Chan and Maffulli, 1996).

        Hip

Low reliability probably due to large ROM (Chan and Maffulli, 1996) However, Suomi et al (1993) did find correlation coefficients between 0.98 and 0.99 for hip abduction testing.

        Elbow

Low reliability 0.72-0.83 (Griffin, 1987).

In short Chan and Maffuli (1996) have concluded that more advanced isokinetic machines do not produce higher reliability. Variables with greater numerical values e.g. peak torque of the knee show higher reliability than ones with lower values e.g. peak torque of the elbow and concentric results show greater reliability than eccentric ones.

Statistics

Members : 6632
Content : 113
Web Links : 6
Content View Hits : 2390322

Who's Online

We have 48 guests online
Open