The HUMAC360 is a small box that offers big results. Measuring 4” x 4” x 4” and weighing just 4 pounds, the HUMAC360 attaches to any patient or exercise equipment in seconds, using a 16’ retractable nylon belt. When the belt is pulled the HUMAC Software reports velocity, distance, and if a weight is recorded, power. These functional parameters are displayed on the screen for proper pacing and distance and in reports for evidence based rehabilitation. It could not be easier.
Read the Full StoryOverview:
Although the position is referred to abduction and adduction because of the soft tissue opposition (one leg hits the other) the motion of adduction is normally described from abduction back to neutral (in lying) or slightly beyond (in standing).
These movements can be performed in either the lying (side or supine, or standing positions.
The hip has the same degrees of freedom (movements) as the shoulder, however, unlike the shoulder the hip is bound tightly to the pelvic girdle making it much more stable. This stability gives the hip virtually no intrinsic motion. This limits the hips motion in each plane. This stable configuration reduces the possible contraindications and compensations (anterior tilt in abduction) are limited and easily identifiable. The bony landmarks are easy to find and the range of motion can be used without limitation as injury is unlikely.
The actions of the hip muscles are complex and often change in relation to demands. Any functional motion requires a coordinated effort by several muscles which may participate in many different actions together or individually. The function of some muscles (Medial gluteal is a good example as the posterior section rotates the hip inwards whilst the anterior section can rotate it outwards) changes depending on hip position and whether the position is weight bearing or not.
Lying position (side):
The most stabilised position for testing abduction but it limits adduction to the neutral position. Best for abduction research poor for adduction.

To view a set up video press here
Lying position (supine):
This position requires a dynomometer with allot of height adjustment (Kin-Com) it can be difficult to stabilise correctly.

Standing position:
In the standing position (see below) stabilization is difficult if not impossible (and probably undesirable). Testing in this position is more functional than that in the seated position and allows the investigation of adduction. It is claimed that this is more functional and involves the use of gravity. However, this position is difficult to stabilize. If the knee is allowed to flex the resulting gravitational moment of the leg is lower than if the knee was fully extended and rectus femoris contraction may result in variations of the strength curve. However, flexion of the knee is recommended, although only passively against gravity if for no other reason than to avoid sciatic nerve traction. Best for athletes.

To view a set up video press here
Stabilisation:
Lying: In the lying position stabilisation normally only involves a pelvic strap to prevent the torso from influencing the results and a leg strap for the opposite (non tested) leg.
Standing: Stabilistion in the standing position is not normally required as this is the most functional position.
Attachments:
Lying (side) and Standing: The thigh stabiliser pad is normally used and should be positioned just proximal to the knee joint.
Supine: The pad should be placed just above the foot to hold the weight of the limb. A dual pad can be obtained as described by Donatelli et al. (1991) however this is not necessary. (The knee must be kept straight during the test.)
Axis of rotation:
The instantaneous axis of rotation place the actuator axes opposite the hip joint 1 cm medially to the anterior superior iliac spine (red line seen above).
Anatomical zero:
With leg straight (as in standing).
Range of motion:
The accepted ROM for abduction is 45 degrees whereas for adduction it may be up to 25 degrees (Miller, 1985). Obviously movements into adduction are usually prevented by a mechanical block (the other leg).
Gravity correction:
As the lever arm can be very long and heavy in these movements setting of gravity correction is essential.
Speeds:
Donatelli et al. (1991) suggest velocities between 30-90 degrees/second, however, 30 degrees/second is probably the most functional and practical.
Generally it is accepted that speeds of 30 degrees/second and multiples of this should be used.
Protocols:
| TEST Protocol | General | Patients | Athletes | Research |
| Contraction Cycle | con/con | con/con |
con/con con/ecc |
con/con ecc/ecc |
| Speed/s | 30 or 90 | 30 or 60 | 30-300 | 30-500 |
| Trial Repetitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Repetitions | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Sets | 3 | 3 | 4 | up to 9 |
| Rest | 20-30 | 20-30 | 20-30 | 20 |
| Feedback | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Exercise Protocol | General | Patients | Athletes |
| Contraction Cycle | con/con | con/con | con/ecc |
| Speed/s | 30 up to 90 | 30 up to 90 | 30-300 |
| Trial Repetitions | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Repetitions | 10 | 10 | 14 |
| Sets | 6 | 6 | up to 12 |
| Rest | 30-60 | 30-60 | 30 |
| Feedback | bar | bar | bar |
Interpretation:
In the hip it is normal to look at the ratio between the right and left sides there should be a 0-10% difference between the sides. Anything beyond this would indicate a muscle imbalance which would be best corrected.
Eccentric results are generally 30% higher than concentric within the same muscle.
Concentric/concentric ratio; abduction/adduction 0.40% this means the abductors are only 40% of the adductors or the other way around is the adductors are 60% stronger than the abductors.
Normative values:
| Donatelli et al. (1991) | Age | Sex | Machine | ftlbs peak | ftlbs peak |
| speed deg/s | 26 | Abduction | Adduction | ||
| 60 | F | 42.6 | 108.2 | ||
| 60 | M | 63.8 | 152.6 | ||
| Poulmedis et al. (1985) | 28 | M | |||
| 30 | 87.8 | 118 | |||
| 90 | 64.9 | 101 | |||
| 180 | 48.7 | 80.4 | |||
| Tippett (1986) | 20 | M | |||
| 30 dominant | 80 | 104 | |||
| 30 non dominant | 87 | 107 | |||
| Tippett (1986) | 20 | M | |||
| 180 dominant | 48 | 96 | |||
| 180 non dominant | 44 | 97 | |||
| Biodex Values | N/A | Biodex | |||
| abduction/adduction ratio % |
Dominant flex/ext% |
|
| Donatelli et al (1991) | ||
| 60 | F 26yrs | 0.41 |
| 60 | M 26yrs | 0.48 |
| Poulmedis (1985) | M 28yrs | |
| 30 | 0.74 |
Hip adductor / abductor concentric strength values (based on Cahalan et al 1989 and Donatelli et al 1991)
|
Female |
Male |
|
18-30 yrs. |
20-40 yrs. |
40-81 yrs. |
18-30 yrs. |
20-40 yrs. |
40-81 yrs. |
|
|
Adduction |
||||||
|
30/sec |
82 |
63 |
121 |
99 |
||
|
60/sec |
146 |
207 |
||||
|
90/sec |
62 |
44 |
103 |
83 |
||
|
Abduction |
||||||
|
30/sec |
66 |
48 |
103 |
75 |
||
|
60/sec |
58 |
86 |
||||
|
90/sec |
54 |
38 |
79 |
63 |